Post by account_disabled on Jan 23, 2024 12:23:29 GMT 1
Although it lost one of its citations in “Band 1” — reserved for those most highly recommended in surveys carried out with clients and partners — Pinheiro remains the most awarded Brazilian firm by the publication Chambers and Partners Latin America 2018 . The English magazine's ranking shows that the firm is the best in Brazil in 14 areas of Law. Filho, Filho, Junior and Quiroga , with 8 mentions, remains in second place, while Machado, Meyer, and , with 7 mentions, remains in third. But this firm lost the company of on the podium — with 5 mentions in the highest category, two less than last year, the firm fell to fourth place.
Although the ranking favors full-service firms , specialist Buy Phone Number List boutiques are also mentioned, such as Renato Mange (in the recovery and bankruptcy area), LO Baptista (arbitration) and Ernesto (insurance). “Since such a product is of an essential nature, and the product defect was not remedied within the period stipulated by article 18, §1º of the CDC, the plaintiff's assertion of having requested, at the time, an immediate exchange is justified. of good, which had not happened”, explained the magistrate. “The moral damage is unequivocal, considering the evident frustration caused to the author who was unable to enjoy the acquired property without it presenting recurring defects, experiencing feelings that certainly go beyond the limit of mere annoyance”, he explained.
Criticism will be thrown at this decision, however, if it serves to shake things up and save just one life, it will be worth it”, he concluded. With the emergence of the CDC, the issue of prohibiting the capitalization of interest in bank contracts began to be repeatedly invoked in legal demands, especially in light of the new rights guaranteed to consumers. The protection of contractual balance (article 4, III, article 51, IV and paragraph 1), clarity in information on the costs and risks of contracts (article 6, III and 52) and the prohibition of excessive onerousness (article 51, paragraph 1, III) began to be invoked as grounds for exercising the consumer's basic right to modify contractual clauses (article 6, V).
Although the ranking favors full-service firms , specialist Buy Phone Number List boutiques are also mentioned, such as Renato Mange (in the recovery and bankruptcy area), LO Baptista (arbitration) and Ernesto (insurance). “Since such a product is of an essential nature, and the product defect was not remedied within the period stipulated by article 18, §1º of the CDC, the plaintiff's assertion of having requested, at the time, an immediate exchange is justified. of good, which had not happened”, explained the magistrate. “The moral damage is unequivocal, considering the evident frustration caused to the author who was unable to enjoy the acquired property without it presenting recurring defects, experiencing feelings that certainly go beyond the limit of mere annoyance”, he explained.
Criticism will be thrown at this decision, however, if it serves to shake things up and save just one life, it will be worth it”, he concluded. With the emergence of the CDC, the issue of prohibiting the capitalization of interest in bank contracts began to be repeatedly invoked in legal demands, especially in light of the new rights guaranteed to consumers. The protection of contractual balance (article 4, III, article 51, IV and paragraph 1), clarity in information on the costs and risks of contracts (article 6, III and 52) and the prohibition of excessive onerousness (article 51, paragraph 1, III) began to be invoked as grounds for exercising the consumer's basic right to modify contractual clauses (article 6, V).